No one can't end religions. It is not a thing that happens overnight - it is not a thing that can be easily changed.
In human nature is to believe something, to be part of a group and so on.
Religions are not necessarily a bad thing. It is part of human evolution.
Also although religions have bad influences it has had good influences through history too.
Architecture, literature - art in generally has gone hand in hand with religion.
Ending religions - it is just an idea of people who think that it is ultimately better to not be part of any religion and they bring only bad influences to humanity.
People should acknowledge that we are different - and respect anyone else for their point of view - because every opinion is subjective. Roughly everything is subjective - and to enforce one's thought on another is bad. It's like a crusade against crusaders themselves. By trying to convert them religious people to nonreligious people is the same thing as to enforce any other thought.
If humanity comes to the point where it needs no religions - shall be it. But I do not approve of any artificial interferences in humanities's evolution. By suppressing religions people are making them stronger. Religious people start to fundamentalists. Oppressors are always creating beasts.
In human nature is to believe something, to be part of a group and so on.
Religions are not necessarily a bad thing. It is part of human evolution.
Also although religions have bad influences it has had good influences through history too.
Architecture, literature - art in generally has gone hand in hand with religion.
Ending religions - it is just an idea of people who think that it is ultimately better to not be part of any religion and they bring only bad influences to humanity.
People should acknowledge that we are different - and respect anyone else for their point of view - because every opinion is subjective. Roughly everything is subjective - and to enforce one's thought on another is bad. It's like a crusade against crusaders themselves. By trying to convert them religious people to nonreligious people is the same thing as to enforce any other thought.
If humanity comes to the point where it needs no religions - shall be it. But I do not approve of any artificial interferences in humanities's evolution. By suppressing religions people are making them stronger. Religious people start to fundamentalists. Oppressors are always creating beasts.
Nav komentāru:
Ierakstīt komentāru